Trump Fumes as Nobel Peace Prize Goes to Venezuela’s María Corina Machado
The White House lashes out after the Norwegian Nobel Committee honors Venezuelan dissident María Corina Machado not Donald Trump for courage under dictatorship.
Washington, October 10 EST: The moment María Corina Machado’s name was read aloud in Oslo, there was a brief, frozen silence inside the West Wing. Then came the anger.
By midmorning, the White House had accused the Norwegian Nobel Committee of “placing politics over peace,” a line that sounded less like diplomacy and more like wounded pride. President Donald Trump had wanted the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for himself and everyone in Washington knew it.
A Prize That Turned Personal
For Trump, the Nobel was never just a medal. It was validation proof that his brand of deal-making could stand alongside global peacemakers. He had built the narrative carefully: the Abraham Accords, his high-wire meetings with Kim Jong Un, even his brokering attempts in Eastern Europe.
When that validation went instead to a Venezuelan opposition leader who has spent years dodging arrest warrants, the reaction in Washington was visceral.
“Total disgrace,” one senior aide muttered to Reuters, pacing the West Wing corridor. Another called the Nobel Committee “elitist bureaucrats who hate America’s success.” The President himself, true to form, took to social media. “The Nobel Committee is corrupt,” he wrote. “No one has done more for world peace than Donald J. Trump.”
That post said everything. For a man who equates recognition with power, being overlooked is intolerable.
Trump’s Nobel Obsession
Trump’s fascination with the prize has hovered over his political career for years. Back in 2019, he told rally crowds that “Obama got it for doing nothing.” To his followers, that grievance still resonates a reminder that institutions, whether in Oslo or Washington, remain in the hands of people they distrust.
But the Nobel rarely rewards strength; it rewards struggle. Its moral logic is stubbornly old-fashioned. From Aung San Suu Kyi to Liu Xiaobo, from Nelson Mandela to Malala Yousafzai, the committee has almost always sided with those confronting power, not those exercising it. Trump may have negotiated peace agreements, but he also turned them into campaign talking points. To the Norwegians, that distinction mattered.
“Politics Over Peace” Or Just History Repeating
At the press podium, Sarah Huckabee Sanders tried to spin the moment. “Once again,” she said, “the Nobel Committee has chosen politics over peace.” But the argument rang hollow. The committee’s decision wasn’t about partisan politics it was about symbolism. By choosing Machado, they elevated moral courage over geopolitical influence.
The Guardian captured the contrast plainly: “While Trump campaigned for a prize, Machado risked her life for a vote.”
Machado’s Moment And The Price Of Defiance
Machado’s path to this moment has been brutal. For years she’s been followed, threatened, smeared as a “traitor” on Venezuelan state TV. The regime barred her from running in the 2024 election, an election international monitors called a farce. She has lived much of the past year underground.
When news of the award reached Caracas, her supporters gathered quietly in the streets, waving Venezuelan flags under the watch of riot police. “This isn’t about her,” said one protester. “It’s about us about believing again.”
The Nobel Committee praised Machado for her “tireless work promoting democratic rights.” Whether she’ll make it to Oslo in December is uncertain; according to Reuters, her team is weighing a video appearance for security reasons.
America’s Other Nobels
The irony is that Americans dominated nearly every other Nobel field this year. Scientists Mary Brunkow and Fred Ramsdell won the Medicine Prize for unlocking how the immune system avoids attacking itself. John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis shared Physics for advancing quantum theory toward practical use. And in Chemistry, Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson, and Omar Yaghi were honored for creating metal-organic frameworks that could reshape clean energy technology.
As The Washington Post noted, “It’s been a landmark year for American science if not for American diplomacy.”
What Oslo Really Said
Strip away the headlines, and the Nobel Committee’s decision was less about Venezuela or Trump than about the global mood. Around the world, democracies are wobbling, authoritarians are rising, and public trust is threadbare. In that climate, giving the prize to a populist who demands recognition would have looked like surrender.
Instead, the committee chose someone with no army, no platform, and no safe house. In doing so, it reminded the world what the Peace Prize has always tried to represent: moral stamina, not political muscle.
That, more than anything, explains the fury in Washington. The Nobel has never been about diplomacy’s scoreboard; it’s about its conscience.
Trump is expected to revisit the topic this weekend at a Palm Beach rally not to reflect, but to retaliate. If history is a guide, the crowd will cheer, the narrative will tighten, and Oslo will fade into just another grievance to weaponize.
But in Caracas, amid the flicker of candles and the whisper of fear, a woman who can’t step outside her home heard her name spoken in Oslo and for one rare day, the world listened.
New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In Politics, Entertainment, Business, Breaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On Facebook, Instagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.
A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.
