Trump Trade Adviser Blasts Court Ruling on Tariffs
Navarro warns tariff rollback would mean "the end of the United States" as White House pushes appeal.
Washington, August 31 EST: Donald Trump’s tariff machine has just been throttled by the courts, and the political aftershocks are already rattling Washington. A federal appeals court, in a striking 7–4 decision, ruled that the president’s sweeping use of emergency powers to tax imports went too far. For years, Trump cast tariffs as both weapon and shield punishing rivals abroad while rallying supporters at home. Now, a panel of judges has told him he cannot wage trade war by decree.
A Rare Judicial Line in the Sand
The ruling undercuts Trump’s reliance on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the statute he stretched into a catchall justification for tariffs against China, Europe, and anyone else in his crosshairs. The judges reminded him of a constitutional fact that often gets lost in political combat the power to tax and regulate trade belongs, at its core, to Congress.
This is no technical skirmish. It’s a challenge to a presidency that has treated economic policy as a form of executive muscle. For decades, Congress looked the other way as presidents claimed greater freedom over tariffs, sanctions, and trade negotiations. Trump pushed harder than any of them, and now the courts are saying enough.
Navarro’s Alarm Bell
No one voiced the administration’s outrage more forcefully than Peter Navarro, Trump’s hard-line trade adviser. He blasted the ruling as “weaponized partisan injustice” and warned that rolling back the tariffs would mean “the end of the United States.” Navarro has long thrived on apocalyptic language, but his reaction speaks to the stakes.
For Trump’s team, tariffs were never only about economics. They were symbols a way to prove that the White House, not Beijing or Brussels, set the terms of trade. To lose that authority in court is to lose the centerpiece of the “America First” story Trump has been telling for nearly a decade.
Buying Time, Seeking Workarounds
The ruling doesn’t pull the plug immediately. The judges allowed tariffs to remain until mid-October, giving Trump a brief window to appeal. According to Reuters, U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer insists negotiations with foreign partners are still moving forward, a way of telling allies and adversaries that the administration hasn’t lost its grip.
At the same time, Trump’s lawyers are eyeing obscure legal provisions such as Section 338 of the 1930 Tariff Act, a dusty relic of Depression-era trade law, in hopes of finding a stopgap. The very fact that they’re rummaging through century-old statutes shows how precarious the administration’s footing has become.
Why It Matters Beyond Trade
The decision hits at more than supply chains or commodity prices. It reopens an old American question how much economic power should one president hold? When Franklin Roosevelt used emergency authority to seize gold and restrict trade in the 1930s, it was in the shadow of the Great Depression and looming war. Trump’s version was broader, blunter, and permanent.
The appeals court is effectively telling him that emergency powers cannot be a standing substitute for congressional will. If that ruling holds, it resets the balance between the branches in a way not seen since the post-Watergate reforms of the 1970s, when lawmakers tried briefly to claw back authority from the White House.
The Coming Supreme Court Clash
Trump’s next move is clear take it to the Supreme Court. If the justices side with him, future presidents will inherit a weaponized vision of trade authority able to impose sweeping tariffs without ever consulting Congress. If they rule against him, the decision could permanently narrow the scope of executive power in economic matters.
Either way, the case is a hinge moment. For businesses, the uncertainty is already costly. Importers and exporters don’t know if the tariff regime will collapse in October or persist for years. For global partners, the message is that U.S. trade policy is no longer predictable.
And for Trump himself, the risk is existential. He built his political brand on the image of a leader unafraid to break rules to defend American workers. If the courts strip away that tool, he faces the one thing he has never been comfortable with limits.
New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In Politics, Entertainment, Business, Breaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On Facebook, Instagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.
A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.
