Advertisement
NewsPolitics

Trump Declares Israel-Iran Ceasefire ‘In Effect’ As Strikes Continue

Despite Trump’s bold ceasefire announcement, reports of missiles and airstrikes expose the fragile truth behind the rhetoric.

Washington, June 24 EST: For a man no longer in office, Donald Trump is once again at the center of a Middle East ceasefire — this time between two of the region’s most volatile actors: Israel and Iran. On Tuesday, Trump declared the guns were silent. They weren’t.

He told the world the warplanes had turned around, that a “complete and total ceasefire” was in place. But even as he spoke, explosions echoed across Tehran, and Israeli air defenses lit up the night sky. If there was a pause, it lasted minutes.

Declarations Versus Deterrence

Trump’s announcement, made late Monday after a limited Iranian missile strike on a U.S. base in Qatar, was bold, public, and — judging by the following 24 hours — deeply premature.

This isn’t the first time an American president has tried to will peace into being through sheer force of narrative. Ronald Reagan attempted something similar in Lebanon in the 1980s, only to watch U.S. Marines die in a truck bomb attack months later. In geopolitics, messaging without muscle rarely moves missiles.

Trump’s tone on Tuesday was more commanding than conciliatory. He issued what amounted to an order to Israel: stop bombing, return home, don’t drag the United States deeper into a conflict it doesn’t want. He even pantomimed jets turning around with a wave of his hand.

But the reality is, Israel isn’t taking orders, not from Washington and certainly not from a former president with no formal portfolio. Reports suggest Israeli operations continued, or at least were prepared to — a quiet signal that Jerusalem still sees Tehran as an active threat, ceasefire or not.

A Broker Without a Deal

The ceasefire Trump announced had no paperwork, no signatures, no UN oversight. There was no joint statement from the parties involved, and no timeline for verification. What it had was optics — a Trumpian declaration of control over chaos.

But power in the Middle East isn’t granted through press releases, and both Israel and Iran have long histories of agreeing to one thing and doing another. This one was no different.

By sunrise Tuesday, Iranian missiles were reportedly launched toward Israel, and Israeli radio described a strike on a radar site near Tehran. Trump’s ceasefire was already being violated, and he knew it. Still, he stood by it, telling reporters it was “in effect,” even as the facts on the ground betrayed that claim.

Power, Leverage, and the Limits of Rhetoric

Trump’s leverage here is personal, not institutional. Whatever backchannels he used to get both parties to temporarily stand down — if only for optics — speak to a unique kind of political capital. But that currency doesn’t spend well when the stakes are existential.

The former president may still carry weight in Israeli political circles and with hardliners in Tehran who see U.S. unpredictability as leverage. But that’s not the same as commanding deference, especially when missiles are already in flight.

And while Trump’s performance at the NATO summit in The Hague was focused on de-escalation, it’s unclear if any of the current administration’s career diplomats were even in the loop. This was vintage Trump: freelance diplomacy, driven by bravado and real-time media framing.

A Familiar Pattern with Higher Stakes

The pattern is familiar: a dramatic announcement, a flurry of conflicting reports, a blame game over breaches. Trump chastised both sides on Tuesday, saying he was “very unhappy” with the violations — but saved particular ire for Israel, whose pilots he said “must return home.”

That’s a rare public scolding of a longtime U.S. ally, and one that reflects how fragile the chain of command becomes in moments like this. The U.S. wants de-escalation. Israel wants security. Iran wants leverage. None of them trust the other enough to pause without watching their backs.

What we’re left with is a ceasefire in name only — a diplomatic theater performed under live fire.

Where This Goes Next

If Trump’s goal was to buy time, he may have succeeded, barely. But unless the ceasefire is translated into tangible military restraint — on both sides — it will be remembered as just another headline, not a turning point.

And in a region where optics can trigger escalation just as fast as rockets, the risks of misreading the moment remain dangerously high.


New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In PoliticsEntertainmentBusinessBreaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On FacebookInstagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.

A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.
+ posts

A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.

Source
AP NewsReutersThe Washington PostReuters

Related Articles

Back to top button