June 24 EST: When Donald Trump posted “MAKE MY DAY” to Truth Social this week, he wasn’t just taunting his political enemies. He was issuing a challenge — one sharpened by calculation, not impulse.
The line, lifted from Sudden Impact, served as the former president’s response to Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who had called for his impeachment following his authorization of U.S. airstrikes on Iranian nuclear targets. But beneath the movie reference, the post did what Trump posts always do: it baited, reframed the conversation, and forced Democrats to react on his terms.
It’s a play Trump has run before. But this time, it comes amid fresh questions about presidential power, Congressional oversight, and the limits — if any — on someone who no longer holds office but still wields the loyalty of a political movement.
A Familiar Formula: Scorn, Spectacle, and Strategic Provocation
Trump’s post — which labeled Ocasio-Cortez “stupid,” accused Rep. Ilhan Omar of coming from a “Failed Country,” and described Rep. Jasmine Crockett as “Low IQ” — follows the familiar contours of his political messaging: personalize, insult, deflect. It’s not subtle, but it’s not off-the-cuff either. These attacks, often racialized and gendered, are designed to resonate with a base that feels besieged by progressive politics and urban liberalism.
But what’s more important than tone is timing. Trump’s airstrikes on Iran — conducted without public Congressional consultation — have revived longstanding debates over the War Powers Resolution, passed in 1973 in the wake of Vietnam to rein in unilateral military action. Presidents from both parties have tested its limits, but rarely has a former president, operating in a murky post-office gray zone, taken such decisive military action with so little accountability.
Trump knows this ambiguity works to his advantage. The harder Democrats push back, the more he frames it as overreach. If they don’t push at all, he gets away with setting a new norm.
Can Congress Rein in a Former President?
That’s the real tension: is there such a thing as post-presidency impunity when the individual remains politically active, publicly influential, and, by some measures, still acting as a de facto commander-in-chief?
Ocasio-Cortez and her progressive allies argue no. In her view, allowing Trump’s strike to go unchallenged — legally or politically — risks gutting the separation of powers altogether. But her impeachment call lacks institutional backing, at least for now. Speaker Hakeem Jeffries has not endorsed any such move, and Democratic leadership appears wary of repeating a third impeachment process without a clear roadmap — or result.
Trump’s gambit, however, doesn’t require Democrats to actually move forward. By throwing down the impeachment gauntlet himself, he turns the narrative from “Did he violate war powers?” to “Will they dare try again?” He dares them to make him the martyr he loves to be — while making them look divided if they don’t.
Political Memory and the Limits of Outrage
There’s historical precedent here, but also key differences. In 1974, when Richard Nixon faced impeachment over abuse of power, the process was bolstered by bipartisan consensus and a paper trail of clear violations. In Trump’s case, the facts are contested, the legal framework is ambiguous, and the politics are poisoned.
Trump is not operating from a place of executive secrecy. He’s baiting on open platforms, building narratives in real time. The “MAKE MY DAY” post is designed to blur lines — between satire and menace, movie quote and constitutional crisis.
And that’s the power play: force your opponents into a corner, then mock them for standing still.
What’s Next: Legal Shadows, Political Spotlight
There’s no clear legal doctrine governing military actions authorized by a former president. The Biden administration, by remaining silent, risks appearing complicit or flat-footed. Meanwhile, Democrats must decide whether to treat Trump’s posturing as political theater or institutional threat.
Trump’s allies will likely dismiss the uproar as overreaction — “just Trump being Trump.” But that phrase, once used to minimize the unusual, now masks the normalizing of rule-bending behavior. At some point, American politics has to reckon with whether provocations like these are spectacle, strategy, or both.
And for Trump, the answer doesn’t really matter. So long as he sets the terms, the reaction is already the reward.
New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In Politics, Entertainment, Business, Breaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On Facebook, Instagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.
A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.
