Advertisement
Politics

Trump Ends Secret Service Protection for Kamala Harris

Biden’s extension revoked, protection to cease September 1 ahead of Harris’s national book tour.

Washington, August 29 EST: Donald Trump has taken back what his predecessor gave. In a late-summer memorandum, the president ordered the Secret Service to end extended protection for Kamala Harris, leaving the former vice president without a federal security detail just as she prepares to return to the public stage.

A Protection Pulled Just As Spotlight Returns

By law, former vice presidents receive six months of coverage. Harris’s expired on July 21. But before leaving office, Joe Biden extended her detail for another year, citing what aides described as ongoing threats. Trump’s memo, dated August 28, overrides that decision and sets September 1 as the cutoff.

The timing is conspicuous. Later this month Harris begins a national tour for her memoir, 107 Days, an account of the last, turbulent stretch of the Biden presidency. Crowds, media, heightened visibility precisely the circumstances that normally trigger greater protection. Instead, she will walk into those venues stripped of it.

Power As Punishment

Trump is within his rights to act. The extension was discretionary, not automatic. But the choice to revoke an existing order is extraordinary. Past administrations have let extensions run their course, even when they involved rivals. What’s happening here is different the weaponization of discretion.

This fits a broader pattern. Trump has already ended Secret Service coverage for John Bolton, Hunter Biden, and Ashley Biden. Each case carried the same imprint legal justification on the surface, political reprisal underneath. Former officials warn that this approach turns protection, once a neutral function of government, into another instrument of presidential favor.

Harris As Target

For Harris, the decision is not theoretical. She remains one of the most recognized Democrats in the country, a possible contender in future elections, and a lightning rod for partisan anger. Threats against high-profile women in politics have only intensified in recent years; security experts say the loss of federal coverage is not just symbolic, it is dangerous.

“You can hire private security,” one former agent explained, “but you can’t replicate the intelligence network that comes with the Secret Service.” That network surveillance of online chatter, coordination with local law enforcement, advance teams simply doesn’t exist outside federal infrastructure.

California Moves To Fill The Gap

Back home, Harris’s allies aren’t standing idle. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass blasted Trump’s order as “revenge politics” and vowed to work with Governor Gavin Newsom to build a protective net. State officials are weighing options Highway Patrol escorts, local police coordination, and private firms staffed by ex-agents. None of it is seamless, but leaving Harris exposed during a book tour would be politically and morally indefensible.

The move also places Newsom in a delicate position. Shielding Harris invites accusations of partisanship. But failing to do so would leave California complicit if the worst were to happen.

A Break With Norms

History shows just how unusual this is. Dan Quayle received extended coverage in the 1990s amid credible threats. So did Dick Cheney after leaving office in 2009. In both cases, the extensions were respected by the incoming administration, regardless of party. Harris is now the first to see hers revoked midstream.

That precedent matters. It signals that in Trump’s Washington, security itself is politicized. Who receives it and who doesn’t is not a neutral calculation of risk but a reflection of loyalty and enmity.

The Broader Message

Trump’s decision lands as another reminder that the machinery of government can be bent to personal grievance. Legally, he is on solid ground. Politically, the message is clear opponents will not enjoy the protections once considered automatic.

For Harris, the immediate challenge is logistical how to move safely through a book tour without the state’s infrastructure. For the rest of the country, the challenge is more unsettling accepting that something as basic as protection from assassination attempts is now part of the partisan battlefield.

The shield is gone. The risks remain. And that, more than any memoir, will define the weeks ahead.


New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In PoliticsEntertainmentBusinessBreaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On FacebookInstagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.

A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.
+ posts

A political science PhD who jumped the academic ship to cover real-time governance, Olivia is the East Coast's sharpest watchdog. She dissects power plays in Trenton and D.C. without bias or apology.

Related Articles

Back to top button