Advertisement
BusinessNews

Paramount in Advanced Talks to Settle Trump Lawsuit Amid $8.4B Skydance Merger

A proposed $20 million payout could resolve Trump’s defamation claim against CBS and help Paramount clear the runway for its high-stakes merger.

June 30 EST: As Paramount Global races to close its $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media, it’s quietly negotiating a high-risk legal settlement that could smooth — or complicate — the deal’s final stretch.

A new court filing in Texas confirms that Paramount is in “good faith, advanced” settlement talks with Donald Trump, who sued CBS News in 2024 over a “60 Minutes” interview with then–Vice President Kamala Harris. Trump’s lawsuit originally sought $10 billion in damages, later increased to $20 billion, accusing the network of deceptive editing and reputational harm.

Now, with a Thursday deadline to pause proceedings, a mediator has proposed a $20 million settlement package — $17 million for Trump’s presidential foundation or museum, and the rest covering legal fees and public-service content focused on antisemitism, according to reporting from Reuters and The Wall Street Journal.

A $20 Million Problem with an $8.4 Billion Backdrop

The lawsuit on its own is an expensive nuisance. But in the context of the Skydance merger — which is still pending FCC review — the case becomes a liability with broader implications. Any legal drama involving a former president, especially one likely to be a top contender in the 2026 race, invites scrutiny. That scrutiny can delay or derail transactions — especially when regulators or lawmakers sense the faintest whiff of political influence.

Paramount has reportedly already offered $15 million, but Trump’s team held firm, seeking $25 million and a public apology. The current mediator-led proposal lands almost exactly in the middle. If either side flinches, the court battle resumes — and it becomes part of Paramount’s due diligence profile.

Inside Paramount, the calculus is familiar: How much is it worth to make a problem go away?

A $20 million payout may be a bitter check to write, but it could also be the cost of eliminating risk during a high-stakes transaction window. That includes limiting exposure to headlines that could drive political pushback or slow FCC sign-off.

For Trump, the leverage lies in timing. With media consolidation a live political issue and 2026 election talk already heating up, he understands the pressure Paramount faces — and appears to be using it effectively.

Optics and Exit Pressure

This isn’t playing out in a vacuum. CBS News has already seen significant leadership changes in recent months, including the departures of President Wendy McMahon and “60 Minutes” executive Bill Owens. While no direct link to the Trump lawsuit has been confirmed, the exits signal institutional shakeup — or, at the very least, a desire to change the channel.

The court has granted a pause in the proceedings through Thursday, giving both parties time to finalize terms or resume litigation. If a deal is inked, expect quiet announcements and fast-moving signatures. If not, the lawsuit could become a persistent drag on Paramount’s public posture during its most consequential strategic move in years.

Bottom Line

This isn’t about who’s right. It’s about risk, timing, and leverage. Paramount is trying to close a merger. Trump sees an opening. And somewhere between $15 million and $25 million lies the cost of moving on.


New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In PoliticsEntertainmentBusinessBreaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On FacebookInstagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.

A Wall Street veteran turned investigative journalist, Marcus brings over two decades of financial insight into boardrooms, IPOs, corporate chess games, and economic undercurrents. Known for asking uncomfortable questions in comfortable suits.
+ posts

A Wall Street veteran turned investigative journalist, Marcus brings over two decades of financial insight into boardrooms, IPOs, corporate chess games, and economic undercurrents. Known for asking uncomfortable questions in comfortable suits.

Source
Reuters MarketScreener The Guardian Wall Street Journal : Financial TimesReuters

Related Articles

Back to top button