Advertisement
BusinessNews

Shell Shuts Down BP Merger Buzz: “No Talks Are Taking Place”

After a surge in BP shares, Shell calls reports of an $80B takeover attempt “market speculation” and reaffirms its focus on discipline and buybacks.

London, June 25 EST: Shell has shut the door—firmly—on reports that it’s eyeing BP for a multibillion-dollar takeover. The energy giant responded swiftly to a Wall Street Journal story that floated the idea of a £60 billion–$80 billion tie-up, dismissing it as “market speculation” and confirming “no talks are taking place.”

The message from Shell’s executive floor: no interest, no offer, no boardroom dance.

That denial came hours after the Journal’s report lit up trading desks and sparked a 10% jump in BP’s U.S.-listed shares. Shell’s stock dipped slightly on the rumor, then settled flat as investors priced in the walk-back.

Why It Looked Plausible

On paper, the speculation wasn’t outlandish. BP has underperformed for years—strategically, operationally, and in the market. Its pivot to renewables has frustrated shareholders, and it remains under pressure from activist investors. In a sector flush with cash and short on growth levers, BP looked like a target.

Shell, meanwhile, has the balance sheet—and track record—to pull something off. With strong earnings, reliable cash flow, and a methodical approach to capital returns, it’s one of the few majors that could absorb a peer of BP’s size.

That said, Shell has consistently telegraphed where it stands: it doesn’t do big acquisitions unless the math is flawless. CEO Wael Sawan, speaking at Shell’s AGM in May, was clear. “Our priority is share buybacks,” he said. “Not chasing scale for the sake of it.”

In other words: they’ve run the models, and they don’t like the yield.

What the Market Read Into It

The timing of the rumor was telling. Crude has stabilized, energy equities are regaining momentum, and Wall Street has resumed its favorite game: guessing who buys whom. The BP-Shell merger would have been the industry’s biggest since ExxonMobil joined forces in 1999—worth more than $80 billion in today’s money.

But Shell’s response wasn’t cagey or conditional. It was a clean break. That’s not how you talk if you’re testing the waters. That’s how you talk when you’ve already walked away.

And the market got the message. BP’s rally cooled after Shell’s statement, while Shell’s stock found its footing again. Traders seemed to accept this isn’t a deal-in-waiting—it’s a dead headline.

BP: Still in the Crosshairs

Even if Shell’s not interested, BP doesn’t exactly look untouchable. The company’s strategic rebrand has been slow to convert into shareholder value, and its current market cap leaves it vulnerable if another suitor with conviction—and less aversion to risk—steps in.

But make no mistake: it’s unlikely that any acquirer gets a free run. Regulators in both London and Washington would scrutinize a deal of that scale. And energy consolidation at the supermajor level would provoke sharp ESG backlash.

Shell’s posture right now is that of a disciplined operator focused on returns, not headlines. It’s making money, buying back shares, and staying in its lane. That’s what the numbers support, and that’s what its boardroom is aligned around.

As for BP, the speculation isn’t going anywhere. But that’s someone else’s story to tell.


New Jersey Times Is Your Source: The Latest In PoliticsEntertainmentBusinessBreaking News, And Other News. Please Follow Us On FacebookInstagram, And Twitter To Receive Instantaneous Updates. Also Do Checkout Our Telegram Channel @Njtdotcom For Latest Updates.

A Wall Street veteran turned investigative journalist, Marcus brings over two decades of financial insight into boardrooms, IPOs, corporate chess games, and economic undercurrents. Known for asking uncomfortable questions in comfortable suits.
+ posts

A Wall Street veteran turned investigative journalist, Marcus brings over two decades of financial insight into boardrooms, IPOs, corporate chess games, and economic undercurrents. Known for asking uncomfortable questions in comfortable suits.

Source
Houston ChronicleThe GuardianReuters Financial TimesMorningstar UK

Related Articles

Back to top button